• Home
  • Facebook
  • Listen live
  • Show Archive

Archive for July, 2009

You are currently browsing the Sheepdog Radio blog archives for July, 2009.

30 Jul 2009

No show today

No show today guys - sorry.  Hopefully I’ll be able to spend some time today cleaning up all of the shows that I owe you and posting them.  I’ll let you know as soon as they’re up.

30 July, 2009 at 14:09 by jim

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

30 Jul 2009

7/23/09 Show

Press the play button below to listen now, or subscribe to our podcast to get our weekly show delivered right to your computer/iPod/etc.

 
30 July, 2009 at 14:08 by jim

Posted in Shows | No Comments »

16 Jul 2009

07/16/09 Show

Press the play button below to listen now, or subscribe to our podcast to get our weekly show delivered right to your computer/iPod/etc.

 

As usual, there’s a lot to talk about.  First of all, I’ve started reading through H.R.3200 (the health care bill), and there’s a very, very important section that you all need to read:

Section 102 (a) (1) (A)

(A) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in this paragraph, the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day of Y1.

So while supporters of this bill are telling everyone that they will be able to keep their current private insurance, what they’re leaving out is that they can not switch private insurers after the first year this law is in effect, because those insurers won’t be able to enroll new individuals.  Section 102 goes on to state that insurers can’t change their terms, conditions, or benefits after the first year.  What if a private insurer wants to create a new plan, or a completely new insurance company wants to offer health insurance?  Section 102(c)(1) has you covered:

(1) IN GENERAL- Individual health insurance coverage that is not grandfathered health insurance coverage under subsection (a) may only be offered on or after the first day of Y1 as an Exchange-participating health benefits plan.

An “Exchange-participating health benefits plan” is a euphemism for “heavily regulated ‘private’ plan”.  Section 203 describes exactly what that is, and what will be required of private insurers if they’re not “grandfathered in.”  At what point do we begin to say that the government has overstepped its bounds?  Is it when it stipulates the service packages a private organization can offer its customers?  How much further do they need to go?

This bill will be a big topic on the show, as well as a few other things.. stay tuned..
I’ll also be discussing the Sotomayor “confirmation”, a little more on the cap & trade bill, and some foreign politics - tune in LIVE at 5!

16 July, 2009 at 14:02 by jim

Posted in Shows | 1 Comment »

16 Jul 2009

The Democrats’ Health Care Organizational Chart

Just look at this.  I don’t even need to comment.  Some say that if one were to convert this to actual “red tape” it would wrap the globe two times (actually, I just made that up).

Courtesy of Newsmax

16 July, 2009 at 2:05 by jim

Tags: health care
Posted in Politics | 1 Comment »

12 Jul 2009

I wish we were more like the French, don’t you?

I don’t normally post about or discuss the internal politics of foreign nations that don’t affect us, but I felt it necessary to point out this ridiculous French law, now being revived.  The left will often tell us that we need to be more like Europe, either by saying those exact words, by modeling various legislation after the laws of European countries, or by touring Europe apologizing for the United States’ lack of “progressive” ideals.  So, in that light, I feel it is important to point out some of the laws that these European countries, lightyears ahead of us in all aspects of politics, from foreign policy to civil liberties, embrace so dearly:

The French “Three Strikes” law is back on — a law that can punish you for being accused of copyright infringement by cutting off your internet connection, fining you, and putting you in prison. It also criminalizes offering free internet access because pirates might use it.

http://www.boingboing.net/2009/07/12/sarkozy-brings-back.html

12 July, 2009 at 16:11 by jim

Tags: french, internet, piracy, three strikes
Posted in News, On Liberals, On Politics, World | No Comments »

10 Jul 2009

Francisco’s Money Speech

We discussed this on our 7/09/09 show, and promised we’d post it.  Below is “Francisco’s Money Speech”, the speech given by Francisco d’Anconia in Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand.  For me, it sums up everything I have felt about my own work ethic, about the meaning of money and its place in society, and about a particular type of mentality/work ethic that seems to be lingering in our society - but is somewhat difficult to pinpoint and describe in a general fashion.  It essentially puts in to words what I, and I have a feeling many others, have been feeling.  That’s something that Ayn Rand accomplishes in every page of Atlas Shrugged, so I highly recommend that you read the novel, but this is a particularly important passage.

“So you think that money is the root of all evil?” said Francisco d’Anconia. “Have you ever asked what is the root of money? Money is a tool of exchange, which can’t exist unless there are goods produced and men able to produce them. Money is the material shape of the principle that men who wish to deal with one another must deal by trade and give value for value. Money is not the tool of the moochers, who claim your product by tears, or of the looters, who take it from you by force. Money is made possible only by the men who produce. Is this what you consider evil?

“When you accept money in payment for your effort, you do so only on the conviction that you will exchange it for the product of the effort of others. It is not the moochers or the looters who give value to money. Not an ocean of tears not all the guns in the world can transform those pieces of paper in your wallet into the bread you will need to survive tomorrow. Those pieces of paper, which should have been gold, are a token of honor–your claim upon the energy of the men who produce. Your wallet is your statement of hope that somewhere in the world around you there are men who will not default on that moral principle which is the root of money, Is this what you consider evil?

“Have you ever looked for the root of production? Take a look at an electric generator and dare tell yourself that it was created by the muscular effort of unthinking brutes. Try to grow a seed of wheat without the knowledge left to you by men who had to discover it for the first time. Try to obtain your food by means of nothing but physical motions–and you’ll learn that man’s mind is the root of all the goods produced and of all the wealth that has ever existed on earth.

“But you say that money is made by the strong at the expense of the weak? What strength do you mean? It is not the strength of guns or muscles. Wealth is the product of man’s capacity to think. Then is money made by the man who invents a motor at the expense of those who did not invent it? Is money made by the intelligent at the expense of the fools? By the able at the expense of the incompetent? By the ambitious at the expense of the lazy? Money is made–before it can be looted or mooched–made by the effort of every honest man, each to the extent of his ability. An honest man is one who knows that he can’t consume more than he has produced.’

“To trade by means of money is the code of the men of good will. Money rests on the axiom that every man is the owner of his mind and his effort. Money allows no power to prescribe the value of your effort except the voluntary choice of the man who is willing to trade you his effort in return. Money permits you to obtain for your goods and your labor that which they are worth to the men who buy them, but no more. Money permits no deals except those to mutual benefit by the unforced judgment of the traders. Money demands of you the recognition that men must work for their own benefit, not for their own injury, for their gain, not their loss–the recognition that they are not beasts of burden, born to carry the weight of your misery–that you must offer them values, not wounds–that the common bond among men is not the exchange of suffering, but the exchange of goods. Money demands that you sell, not your weakness to men’s stupidity, but your talent to their reason; it demands that you buy, not the shoddiest they offer, but the best that your money can find. And when men live by trade–with reason, not force, as their final arbiter–it is the best product that wins, the best performance, the man of best judgment and highest ability–and the degree of a man’s productiveness is the degree of his reward. This is the code of existence whose tool and symbol is money. Is this what you consider evil?

“But money is only a tool. It will take you wherever you wish, but it will not replace you as the driver. It will give you the means for the satisfaction of your desires, but it will not provide you with desires. Money is the scourge of the men who attempt to reverse the law of causality–the men who seek to replace the mind by seizing the products of the mind.

“Money will not purchase happiness for the man who has no concept of what he wants: money will not give him a code of values, if he’s evaded the knowledge of what to value, and it will not provide him with a purpose, if he’s evaded the choice of what to seek. Money will not buy intelligence for the fool, or admiration for the coward, or respect for the incompetent. The man who attempts to purchase the brains of his superiors to serve him, with his money replacing his judgment, ends up by becoming the victim of his inferiors. The men of intelligence desert him, but the cheats and the frauds come flocking to him, drawn by a law which he has not discovered: that no man may be smaller than his money. Is this the reason why you call it evil?

“Only the man who does not need it, is fit to inherit wealth–the man who would make his own fortune no matter where he started. If an heir is equal to his money, it serves him; if not, it destroys him. But you look on and you cry that money corrupted him. Did it? Or did he corrupt his money? Do not envy a worthless heir; his wealth is not yours and you would have done no better with it. Do not think that it should have been distributed among you; loading the world with fifty parasites instead of one, would not bring back the dead virtue which was the fortune. Money is a living power that dies without its root. Money will not serve the mind that cannot match it. Is this the reason why you call it evil?

“Money is your means of survival. The verdict you pronounce upon the source of your livelihood is the verdict you pronounce upon your life. If the source is corrupt, you have damned your own existence. Did you get your money by fraud? By pandering to men’s vices or men’s stupidity? By catering to fools, in the hope of getting more than your ability deserves? By lowering your standards? By doing work you despise for purchasers you scorn? If so, then your money will not give you a moment’s or a penny’s worth of joy. Then all the things you buy will become, not a tribute to you, but a reproach; not an achievement, but a reminder of shame. Then you’ll scream that money is evil. Evil, because it would not pinch-hit for your self-respect? Evil, because it would not let you enjoy your depravity? Is this the root of your hatred of money?

“Money will always remain an effect and refuse to replace you as the cause. Money is the product of virtue, but it will not give you virtue and it will not redeem your vices. Money will not give you the unearned, neither in matter nor in spirit. Is this the root of your hatred of money?

“Or did you say it’s the love of money that’s the root of all evil? To love a thing is to know and love its nature. To love money is to know and love the fact that money is the creation of the best power within you, and your passkey to trade your effort for the effort of the best among men. It’s the person who would sell his soul for a nickel, who is loudest in proclaiming his hatred of money–and he has good reason to hate it. The lovers of money are willing to work for it. They know they are able to deserve it.

“Let me give you a tip on a clue to men’s characters: the man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it.

“Run for your life from any man who tells you that money is evil. That sentence is the leper’s bell of an approaching looter. So long as men live together on earth and need means to deal with one another–their only substitute, if they abandon money, is the muzzle of a gun.

“But money demands of you the highest virtues, if you wish to make it or to keep it. Men who have no courage, pride or self-esteem, men who have no moral sense of their right to their money and are not willing to defend it as they defend their life, men who apologize for being rich–will not remain rich for long. They are the natural bait for the swarms of looters that stay under rocks for centuries, but come crawling out at the first smell of a man who begs to be forgiven for the guilt of owning wealth. They will hasten to relieve him of the guilt–and of his life, as he deserves.

“Then you will see the rise of the men of the double standard–the men who live by force, yet count on those who live by trade to create the value of their looted money–the men who are the hitchhikers of virtue. In a moral society, these are the criminals, and the statutes are written to protect you against them. But when a society establishes criminals-by-right and looters-by-law–men who use force to seize the wealth of disarmed victims–then money becomes its creators’ avenger. Such looters believe it safe to rob defenseless men, once they’ve passed a law to disarm them. But their loot becomes the magnet for other looters, who get it from them as they got it. Then the race goes, not to the ablest at production, but to those most ruthless at brutality. When force is the standard, the murderer wins over the pickpocket. And then that society vanishes, in a spread of ruins and slaughter.

“Do you wish to know whether that day is coming? Watch money. Money is the barometer of a society’s virtue. When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion–when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing–when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors–when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you–when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice–you may know that your society is doomed. Money is so noble a medium that is does not compete with guns and it does not make terms with brutality. It will not permit a country to survive as half-property, half-loot.

“Whenever destroyers appear among men, they start by destroying money, for money is men’s protection and the base of a moral existence. Destroyers seize gold and leave to its owners a counterfeit pile of paper. This kills all objective standards and delivers men into the arbitrary power of an arbitrary setter of values. Gold was an objective value, an equivalent of wealth produced. Paper is a mortgage on wealth that does not exist, backed by a gun aimed at those who are expected to produce it. Paper is a check drawn by legal looters upon an account which is not theirs: upon the virtue of the victims. Watch for the day when it bounces, marked, ‘Account overdrawn.’

“When you have made evil the means of survival, do not expect men to remain good. Do not expect them to stay moral and lose their lives for the purpose of becoming the fodder of the immoral. Do not expect them to produce, when production is punished and looting rewarded. Do not ask, ‘Who is destroying the world? You are.

“You stand in the midst of the greatest achievements of the greatest productive civilization and you wonder why it’s crumbling around you, while you’re damning its life-blood–money. You look upon money as the savages did before you, and you wonder why the jungle is creeping back to the edge of your cities. Throughout men’s history, money was always seized by looters of one brand or another, whose names changed, but whose method remained the same: to seize wealth by force and to keep the producers bound, demeaned, defamed, deprived of honor. That phrase about the evil of money, which you mouth with such righteous recklessness, comes from a time when wealth was produced by the labor of slaves–slaves who repeated the motions once discovered by somebody’s mind and left unimproved for centuries. So long as production was ruled by force, and wealth was obtained by conquest, there was little to conquer, Yet through all the centuries of stagnation and starvation, men exalted the looters, as aristocrats of the sword, as aristocrats of birth, as aristocrats of the bureau, and despised the producers, as slaves, as traders, as shopkeepers–as industrialists.

“To the glory of mankind, there was, for the first and only time in history, a country of money–and I have no higher, more reverent tribute to pay to America, for this means: a country of reason, justice, freedom, production, achievement. For the first time, man’s mind and money were set free, and there were no fortunes-by-conquest, but only fortunes-by-work, and instead of swordsmen and slaves, there appeared the real maker of wealth, the greatest worker, the highest type of human being–the self-made man–the American industrialist.

“If you ask me to name the proudest distinction of Americans, I would choose–because it contains all the others–the fact that they were the people who created the phrase ‘to make money.’ No other language or nation had ever used these words before; men had always thought of wealth as a static quantity–to be seized, begged, inherited, shared, looted or obtained as a favor. Americans were the first to understand that wealth has to be created. The words ‘to make money’ hold the essence of human morality.

“Yet these were the words for which Americans were denounced by the rotted cultures of the looters’ continents. Now the looters’ credo has brought you to regard your proudest achievements as a hallmark of shame, your prosperity as guilt, your greatest men, the industrialists, as blackguards, and your magnificent factories as the product and property of muscular labor, the labor of whip-driven slaves, like the pyramids of Egypt. The rotter who simpers that he sees no difference between the power of the dollar and the power of the whip, ought to learn the difference on his own hide– as, I think, he will.

“Until and unless you discover that money is the root of all good, you ask for your own destruction. When money ceases to be the tool by which men deal with one another, then men become the tools of men. Blood, whips and guns–or dollars. Take your choice–there is no other–and your time is running out.”

10 July, 2009 at 4:04 by jim

Tags: atlas shrugged, ayn rand, franciscos money speech, money, work ethic
Posted in On Liberals, On Life, On People, On Politics | No Comments »

9 Jul 2009

07/09/09 Show

Press the play button below to listen now, or subscribe to our podcast to get our weekly show delivered right to your computer/iPod/etc.

 

We’re LIVE today at 5.  Don’t forget to tune in!

Show was great, as usual.  I’m really backed up on posting our shows here, but I promise I’ll get them up as soon as possible.

Meanwhile, as promised, I’m going to post Francisco’s Money Speech.

9 July, 2009 at 13:27 by jim

Posted in Shows | No Comments »

2 Jul 2009

07/02/09 Show

Press the play button below to listen now, or subscribe to our podcast to get our weekly show delivered right to your computer/iPod/etc.

 

The servers should be back up today, so assuming we don’t have any other technical difficulties, we’ll be on today at 5!

We have a lot to talk about!  In addition to everything we were supposed to discuss last week (Obama’s interesting press conference and the ABC ObamaCare infomercial), we also need to talk about the Cap & Trade bill, some other news stories from this week, and last night’s Tea Party.  We attended the tea party, and it was fantastic.  The turnout was great, and it definitely renewed my spirits seeing so many like minded Americans gathering in the heart of NYC amidst some of the most radical legislation this country has ever seen.  Head on over to http://www.TeaParty365.org to stay up to date with the newly founded organization’s efforts - they’re doing great work over there.

We’ll see you all later!
This show went very well - we’ll post it here soon.

2 July, 2009 at 14:32 by jim

Posted in Shows | No Comments »

  • Sign up for our mailing list!

    Loading... Loading...
  • Browse By Category

  • Sites We Like

    • 9/12 Project
    • Fox News
    • Glenn Beck
    • Parcbench
    • Sean Hannity
    • TeaParty365
    • The Drudge Report
    • The Patriot Post
  • Archives

    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
  • Calendar

    July 2009
    M T W T F S S
    « Jun   Aug »
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Recent Comments

    • Gail Maimone on The Second American Revolution: How a March on 9/12 Restored My Hope
    • Gail Maimone on The Second American Revolution: How a March on 9/12 Restored My Hope
    • jim on We’re back! LIVE 9/17!
    • Grace Colucci on We’re back! LIVE 9/17!
    • Kathy on The Democrats’ Health Care Organizational Chart
  • Recent Posts

    • Hiatus
    • 9/17 Show
    • The Second American Revolution: How a March on 9/12 Restored My Hope
    • We’re back! LIVE 9/17!
    • Daniel Hannan warns us about nationalized healthcare
Sheepdog Radio is proudly powered by WordPress
Original WordPress theme by Jonk, modified by Sheepdog Radio.
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).